Utilization of Total Joint Arthroplasty in Physician-Owned Specialty Hospitals vs Acute Care Facilities.

BACKGROUND: The recent emergence of physician-owned specialty hospitals has sparked controversy about overutilization. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare utilization patterns of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) between physician-specialty hospitals (PSHs) and acute care hospitals (ACHs). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted from January 2010 to August 2014 comparing primary TJA patients between a PSH and an ACH; 103 PSH patients were matched to 103 ACH patients by age, gender, BMI, and ASA classification with similar case distribution between facilities. All surgeons in the study operated at both hospitals and were shareholders of the PSH. Information on nonoperative treatments, and timing to the initial appointment, consent, and surgery were analyzed using univariate analysis. RESULTS: Nonoperative treatments before surgery were similar between hospitals (P = 1.00). The time from the initial appointment to consent was longer for PSH (P = .0001). However, the time from consent to the date of surgery (P = .04) and the timing from symptoms to initial appointment (P = .006) was shorter for PSH. The time from initial appointment to the day of surgery was similar between groups (P = .20). Patients were more likely to be consented for surgery on their first clinic visit when undergoing surgery at ACH (87 of 103, 84.4%) compared to PSH (61 of 103; 59.2%; P < .001). Length of stay was significantly shorter for both total knee arthroplasty (P = .001) and total hip arthroplasty patients (P = .001) at PSH. CONCLUSION: Facility ownership in PSH resulted in similar conservative treatment before TJA. The time to surgical consent after the initial appointment was longer PSH, whereas the time from consent to the date of surgery was shorter at the PSH.

Identifying in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE): a comparison of claims-based approaches with the Rochester Epidemiology Project VTE cohort.

BACKGROUND: Efforts to identify hospital-acquired complications from claims data by applying exclusion rules to discharge diagnosis codes exhibit low positive predictive value (PPV). The PPV improves when a variable is added to each secondary diagnosis to indicate whether the condition was "present-on-admission" (POA) or "hospital-acquired". Such indicator variables will soon be required for Medicare reimbursement. No estimates are available, however, of the proportion of hospital-acquired complications that are missed (sensitivity) using either exclusion rules or indicator variables. We estimated sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and negative predictive value (NPV) of claims-based approaches using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) venous thromboembolism (VTE) cohort as a "gold standard." METHODS: All inpatient encounters by Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents at Mayo Clinic-affiliated hospitals 1995-1998 constituted the at-risk-population. REP-identified hospital-acquired VTE consisted of all objectively-diagnosed VTE among County residents 1995-1998, whose onset of symptoms occurred during inpatient stays at these hospitals, as confirmed by detailed review of County residents' provider-linked medical records. Claims-based approaches used billing data from these hospitals. RESULTS: Of 37,845 inpatient encounters, 98 had REP-identified hospital-acquired VTE; 47 (48%) were medical encounters. NPV and specificity were >99% for both claims-based approaches. Although indicator variables provided higher PPV (74%) compared with exclusion rules (35%), the sensitivity for exclusion rules was 74% compared with only 38% for indicator variables. Misclassification was greater for medical than surgical encounters. CONCLUSIONS: Utility and accuracy of claims data for identifying hospital-acquired conditions, including POA indicator variables, requires close attention be paid by clinicians and coders to what is being recorded.

Inconsistencies between self-reported ethnicity and ethnicity recorded in a health maintenance organization.

PURPOSE: Information on patient ethnicity in hospital admissions databases is often used in epidemiologic and health services research. However, the extent of consistency of these data with self-reported ethnicity is not well studied, particularly for specific Asian subgroups. We examined agreement between ethnicity in records of a sample of members of five Northern California Kaiser Permanente medical centers with self-reported ethnicity. METHODS: Subjects were 3168 cases and 2413 controls aged 45 years and older from a study of fractures. Ethnicity recorded in the Kaiser admissions database (primarily inpatient) was compared with self-reported ethnicity from the study interviews. RESULTS: Among study subjects with available Kaiser ethnicity, sensitivities and positive predictive values of the Kaiser classification were high among blacks (0.95 for both measures) and whites (0.98 and 0.94, respectively), slightly lower among Asians (0.88 and 0.95, respectively), and considerably lower among Hispanics (0.55 and 0.81, respectively) and American Indians (0.47 and 0.50, respectively). Among Asian subgroups, the proportion classified as Asian was high among Chinese (0.94) and Japanese (0.99) but lower among Filipinos (0.79) and other Asians (0.74). Among the 228 (4%) subjects who self-identified with multiple ethnicities, 13 of 18 white + Hispanic subjects were classified as being white, and of the 77 subjects identifying as part American Indian, only one was classified as being American Indian in the Kaiser database. CONCLUSIONS: Given the importance of ethnicity information, medical facilities should be encouraged to adopt policies toward collecting high quality data.

Conflicting interests in private hospital care.

This article looks at key changes impacting on private hospital care: the increasing corporate ownership of private hospitals; the Commonwealth Government's support for private health; the significant increase in health fund membership; and the contracting arrangements between health funds and private hospitals. The changes highlight the often conflicting interests of hospitals, doctors, Government, health funds and patients in the provision of private hospital care. These conflicts surfaced in the debate around allegations of 'cherry picking' by private hospitals of more profitable patients. This is also a good illustration of the increasing entanglement of the Government in the fortunes of the private health industry.

Length of stay in myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the association between length of hospital stay (LOS) and clinical factors, treatment intensity, and use of percutaneous coronary revascularization from 1988 to 1997. BACKGROUND: Multiple factors contribute to the observed reduction in LOS for patients with myocardial infarction. METHODS: We studied a series of 849 consecutive patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction to the Mayo Clinic Coronary Care Unit within three time periods: period I (1988-1990), period II (1991-1993), and period III (1994-1997). RESULTS: Median LOS decreased significantly between 1988 and 1997 (9 days to 5 days, 36% reduction, p < 0.0001), with significant reductions (p < 0.001) associated with certain therapies: primary reperfusion (6 days vs 7 days), b-blockers (6 days vs 8 days), and aspirin (6 days vs 8 days). Hospitalizations were lengthened by coronary artery bypass grafting (12 vs 6 days) and by serious complications (10 vs 6 days). The era of the admission (period I vs II vs III) is a significant, powerful predictor of LOS, even after adjustment for other key variables. CONCLUSION: The 36% reduction in LOS for acute myocardial infarction between 1988 and 1997 is related both to therapeutic modalities and temporal trends. Further study is needed to clarify whether the trend for decreasing LOS persists and influences outcome and health care quality variables.

University associated general practices in three Australian states.

University associated practices in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth were invited to investigate their management structures, funding and academic activities, and compare these with a similar academic general practice in New Zealand. There were a variety of locations, models for funding and delivery of care. There were a number of recurrent themes: balancing competing priorities, the costs of running an academic style of practice, relationships with other local general practitioners, competition for control over the practice, and clinical credibility. These parallelled similar concerns about running an academic practice in New Zealand.

Do general practitioner hospitals reduce the utilisation of general hospital beds? Evidence from Finnmark county in north Norway.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess whether populations with access to general practitioner hospitals (GP hospitals) utilise general hospitals less than populations without such access. DESIGN: Observational study comparing the total rates of admissions and of occupied bed days in general hospitals between populations with and without access to GP hospitals. Comparisons were also made separately for diagnoses commonly encountered in GP hospitals. SETTING: Two general hospitals serving the population of Finnmark county in north Norway. PATIENTS: 35,435 admissions based on five years' routine recordings from the two hospitals. MAIN RESULTS: The total rate of admission to general hospitals was lower in peripheral municipalities with a GP hospital than in central municipalities without this kind of institution, 26% and 28% lower for men and women respectively. The corresponding differences were 38% and 52%, when analysed for occupied bed days. The differences were most pronounced for patients with respiratory diseases, cardiac failure, and cancer who are primarily or intermediately treated or cared for in GP hospitals, and for patients with stroke and fractures, who are regularly transferred from general hospitals to GP hospitals for longer term follow up care. CONCLUSION: GP hospitals seem to reduce the utilisation of general hospitals with respect to admissions as well as occupied bed days.

Selection of a hospital for a transfer: the roles of patients, families, physicians and payers.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the reasons for hospital transfers and the role patients, their families, physicians, and payers play in the choice of a referral center. DATA SOURCES: A thirty-three item questionnaire and clinical data from the hospital's discharge database. STUDY DESIGN: A study of all 307 hospital transfer patients admitted between November 9 and December 3, 1993 was conducted to understand the factors contributing to the increase in transfers and the reasons patients were sent to CCH. Data on the transfer decision were collected by interviewing patients 48 hours after admittance to the hospital or by telephone if they were discharged before an interview could be completed. Two hundred and sixty-two (85%) patients were interviewed. PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: (1) Almost 58% of transfers were patient-initiated or -influenced; the remainder were physician- (38%) or payer-directed (4%); (2) More than 78% of the patients identified lack of clinical expertise/technology at originating hospital as the main reason for transferring. Other reasons included: established CCH patient status (43%), CCH marketing (31%), and concerns regarding quality of care at originating hospital (10%). Financial and quality dumping were not identified as reasons for the transfer. New patients to CCH were more likely to indicate that marketing and lack of clinical resources at originating hospital were reasons for selecting CCH than previous patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients significantly influenced the transfer decision and the transfer decision-making process can be influenced by marketing. The opinions of the consumer should not be underestimated, especially by those seeking non-marketing solutions to health care reform.

The perfect fit. Computerized patient scheduling requires the right mix of software, hardware, and human components.

As the arena of care widens beyond the hospital and begins to rely on moving patients around a scattered and diverse healthcare system, managers and clinicians will need a well-orchestrated method of keeping track of it all. For providers such as Lahey Clinical Medical Center, computerized patient scheduling is the key to a seamless system.

The Finnmark general practitioner hospital study. Patient characteristics, patient flow and alternative care level.

OBJECTIVES: In a study assessing the role of general practitioner hospitals (GPHs) in the health service two main questions were addressed: 1) Are general practitioner beds used for short-term medical observations, or as a supplement for long-term geriatric care? 2) What are the alternatives to stays in GPHs? DESIGN: In a prospective design GPH stays during 8 weeks were recorded. SETTING: 15 GPH units in Finnmark county in Norway. SUBJECTS: 395 completed stays were recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The patients' sex, age and diagnosis, flow of patients, length of stays, bed occupancy rate, and doctors' assessments of alternative level of care. RESULTS: 60% of the patients were admitted from and discharged to their home after a mean stay of 6.8 days. The 19% who were transferred to higher level hospitals stayed significantly shorter than the rest (3.6 days), while 9% transferred from hospital stayed significantly longer (22.3 days). Of the 395 patients discharged 61% were assessed as candidates for higher level hospitals, if GPHs did not exist. 45% of the GPH stays seem to replace higher level hospital admissions. CONCLUSION: The GPHs have a pre-hospital "buffer" function by preventing patients with acute symptoms from being unnecessarily admitted to general hospitals through short-term observation stays. A post-hospital function was also demonstrated, since GPHs allow for long-term follow up stays for patients transferred from general hospitals.

Optimizing resources and access improvement through balanced scheduling in a group practice setting.

The Division of Medicine was able to achieve its goals to improve patient access by increasing the available appointment slots, on average, by 15 percent, balancing schedules to improve resource utilization, ensuring access to all patients within two weeks of a request, and by maintaining cost per case by increasing appointment slots during a period of growth. The process is dynamic in nature and ongoing review by health care access managers is important to identify opportunities for further improvement.

Multisystem geriatric trauma.

PURPOSE: To analyze the demographics, hospital course, functional outcome, and reimbursement for elderly patients sustaining multisystem trauma. METHODS: The Trauma Registry was searched for patients > or = 65 years old with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > or = 10 admitted with multisystem trauma from January 1991 through December 1991. Hospital data were obtained from the Trauma Registry; reimbursement data from the business office; and complete follow-up (mean, 12 months) data by telephone survey for all patients. RESULTS: Of the 1931 trauma patients admitted during the study period, 601 (31%) were > or = 65 years old and 94 (5%) met the study criteria. Of these 94 patients, 52 were women and 42 were men; their mean age was 79 years (range, 65-100). Falls (59%) and motor vehicle crashes (36%) were the predominant causes of injury; closed head injury (CHI) and fractures were the most frequent injuries. The mean ISS was 18 (range, 10-57), and hospital stay averaged 10 days. Intensive care unit admission was necessary for 37%, and 38% required surgical intervention. Factors associated with mortality included previous myocardial infarction, chronic renal insufficiency, ventilatory or inotropic support (or both), shock (systolic BP < or = 90 mm Hg) at admission, bradycardia (HR < or = 60 bpm) at admission, and severe CHI (Glasgow Coma Scale score < or = 8). Mortality was 23% (22 of the 94 patients); three quarters of the deaths occurred in the first 24 hours--most from severe CHI. At discharge, 53% of patients (38 of 72) went home and 36% (26 of 72) went to nursing homes. At a mean follow-up of 12 months, an additional seven patients had died, and three quarters of the patients were at home with an independent functional status. The percentage of reimbursement for care was two thirds of cost. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rates are high for elderly patients who sustain multisystem trauma. Most deaths occur within the first 24 hours, and most injuries are severe CHIs. More than half of survivors are discharged home, and most are independent at long-term follow-up. Reimbursement is not commensurate with the functional outcome achieved and the care provided.

A prospective study of ultrasonography in the ED by emergency physicians.

The objective of this study was to examine the use of limited, goal-directed, two-dimensional ultrasound studies performed by emergency physicians and to assess the frequency, variety, and accuracy of their readings. A 1-year prospective study was performed by using an emergency department (ED) ultrasound machine with a 3.5-mHz mechanical oscillating sector transducer and a 5.0-mHz vaginal transducer. In a series of proctoring sessions, radiologists trained emergency physicians to do limited, goal-directed ultrasonography. Laser print ultrasonograms were collected from all ED ultrasound examinations performed during a 1-year period and were compared with either formal ultrasonograms performed in the radiology department, the patient's hospital record, or both. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV), as well as negative predictive values (NPV), were calculated. The setting was a 104-bed community hospital with an ED volume of 25,000 patients annually, and patients whom the emergency physician believed needed ultrasound studies in the ED were entered. ED ultrasonography was performed in 167 patients by 14 physicians during a 1-year period. For 132 patients who completed formal follow-up, the overall diagnostic accuracy of interpretations of ED ultrasonograms yielded a sensitivity of .95, specificity of .98, PPV of .99, and NPV of .89. Eleven categories of ultrasound use were reported. The three studies most commonly performed were for gallbladder disease (53%), intrauterine pregnancy (28%), and abdominal aortic aneurysms (7%). Accuracy of ED gallbladder ultrasonograms for 65 patients showed a sensitivity of .86, specificity of .97, PPV of .97, and NPV of .85.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Referral selection bias in the Medicare hospital mortality prediction model: are centers of referral for Medicare beneficiaries necessarily centers of excellence?

OBJECTIVE: Although the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) uses Medicare hospital mortality data as a measure of hospital quality of care, concerns have been raised regarding the validity of this concept. A problem that has not been fully evaluated in these data is the potential confounding effect of illness severity factors associated with referral selection and hospital mortality on comparisons of risk-adjusted hospital mortality. We address this issue. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: We analyzed the 1988 Medicare hospitalization data file (MEDPAR). We selected data on patients treated at the two Mayo Clinic-associated hospitals in Rochester, Minnesota, and a group of seven other hospitals that treat many patients from large geographic areas. These hospitals have had observed mortality rates substantially lower than those predicted by the HCFA model for the period 1987-1990. STUDY DESIGN: Using the multiple logistic regression model applied by HCFA to the 1988 data, we evaluated the relationship between distance from patient residence to the admitting hospital and risk-adjusted hospital mortality. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among patients admitted to Mayo Rochester-affiliated hospitals, residence outside Olmsted County, Minnesota was independently associated with a 33 percent lower 30-day mortality rate (p < .001) than that associated with residence in Olmsted County. When patients at Mayo hospitals were stratified by residence (Olmsted County versus non-Olmsted County), the observed mortality was similar to that predicted for community patients (9.6 percent versus 10.2 percent, p = .26), whereas hospital mortality for referral patients was substantially lower than predicted (5.0 percent versus 7.5 percent, p = < .001). After incorporation of the HCFA risk adjustment methods, distance from patient residence to the hospitals was also independently associated with mortality among the Mayo Rochester-affiliated hospitals and seven other referral center hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The HCFA Medicare hospital mortality model should be used with extreme caution to evaluate hospital quality of care for national referral centers because of residual confounding due to severity of illness factors associated with geographic referral that are inadequately captured in the extant prediction model.

Physician-ordered respiratory care vs physician-ordered use of a respiratory therapy consult service: early experience at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation.

BACKGROUND: Accumulative evidence suggests that respiratory care is frequently misallocated. We report the results of a pilot study of a delivery system aimed at correcting such misallocation. METHODS: The delivery system (Respiratory Therapy Consult Service, or RTCS) allows respiratory therapists (when requested by the case-managing physician) to determine respiratory care, with decisions guided by algorithm (ie, Consult patients). In the pilot study, Therapist Evaluators responded to requests for Consults on two study wards. All staff therapists participated in implementing Evaluator-determined treatment. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated 38 patients (20 of whom were Consult patients) randomly selected from a total of 82 patients undergoing abdominal surgery during the study period. RESULTS: Consult patients were significantly older than non-Consult patients, more likely to be heavy smokers (67 vs 43%), and sicker as suggested by a higher Triage Score. Consult patients received more types and more total respiratory care services, demonstrated a trend toward longer stay, and had significantly higher respiratory therapy charges. CONCLUSION: Our experience shows that a consult program can be successfully implemented in a large, tertiary care institution with widespread physician and nursing support. Whether the RTCS fulfills its goal of ameliorating misallocation of respiratory care has yet to be proven and awaits the completion of other studies currently under way.

Utilization of upper limb joint replacements during 1972-90: the Mayo Clinic experience.

Increasing application of expensive medical technologies, including joint replacement, is of concern in the current economic climate. Successful upper limb joint replacements (ULJRs) are being performed, but few detailed data about their utilization are available. To explore the resource implications of such surgery, the utilization of total shoulder replacement (TSR), total elbow replacement (TER) and total wrist replacement (TWR) were examined from the time these procedures first became available at the Mayo Clinic up to 1990. The age- and sex-adjusted utilization rate for TSR among Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents was 1.8 per 100,000 person-years (p-y), 0.8 per 100,000 p-y for TER and 1.1 per 100,000 p-y for TWR. Overall utilization of primary ULJR among Olmsted County residents during the 19-year study period was 3.8 per 100,000 p-y. The commonest indication for TSR was osteoarthritis (46 per cent) and for TER and TWR was rheumatoid arthritis (50 and 81 per cent respectively). There was no consistent trend in the utilization of these procedures among Olmsted County residents, but the number of referral patients receiving a ULJR at the Mayo Clinic increased steadily during the study period. The Mayo Clinic experience suggests an increasing demand for ULJR, particularly TSR and TER. With continued advances in, and diffusion of, the technology this demand may increase further.